
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{>{\raggedright}p{0.4cm}>{\raggedright}p{5.5cm}>{\raggedleft}p{1.1cm}>{\raggedleft}p{0.1cm}>{\raggedright}m{6cm}}
\toprule 
 &
Description &
Value &
 &
\multirow{1}{6cm}{Source}\tabularnewline
\midrule
\midrule 
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Labor supply and taxes}\tabularnewline
\midrule
$\varepsilon$ &
Labor supply elast.  &
0.30 &
 &
\citet{Blundell1999}, \citet{Meghir2010}\tabularnewline
$\xi$ &
Scale disutility of labor &
0.57 &
 &
Match avg. labor inc.\tabularnewline
$\tau$ &
Progressivity param.  &
0.181 &
 &
\citet{Heathcote2017}\tabularnewline
$\lambda$ &
Revenue param.  &
5.568 &
 &
\citet{Heathcote2017}\tabularnewline
$b$ &
Transfer (in thsd. USD) &
 &
 &
Match transfer share\tabularnewline
$t_{S}$ &
Tax on structures in pct. &
1.76 &
\rdelim\}{2}{1em} &
\multirow{2}{6cm}{Based on\\
\citet{Slavik2014}}\tabularnewline
$t_{E}$ &
Tax on equipment in pct. &
1.55 &
 & \tabularnewline
$t_{B}$ &
Tax on robots in pct. &
1.55 &
 &
Set equal to $t_{E}$\tabularnewline
$\iota$ &
Inequality-aversion param. &
0.77 &
 &
Based on \citet{Heathcote2017}\tabularnewline
 &
 &
 &
 &
\tabularnewline
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Skill distribution}\tabularnewline
\midrule
$\sigma_{M}$ &
Standard dev.: manual &
0.33 &
\rdelim\}{6}{1em} &
\multirow{6}{6cm}{Match moments from CPS}\tabularnewline
$\sigma_{R}$ &
Standard dev.: routine &
0.32 &
 & \tabularnewline
$\sigma_{C}$ &
Standard dev.: cognitive &
0.37 &
 & \tabularnewline
$\alpha_{M}$ &
Pareto param.: manual &
4.85 &
 & \tabularnewline
$\alpha_{R}$ &
Pareto param.: routine &
2.34 &
 & \tabularnewline
$\alpha_{C}$ &
Pareto param.: cognitive &
2.45 &
 & \tabularnewline
 &
 &
 &
 &
\tabularnewline
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Participation cost distribution}\tabularnewline
\midrule
$\mu_{P}$ &
Mean: part. costs &
-17.80 &
\rdelim\}{2}{1em} &
\multirow{2}{6cm}{Match moments from CPS}\tabularnewline
$\sigma_{P}$ &
Standard dev.: part. costs &
40.82 &
 & \tabularnewline
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\par\end{center}
